Young people don’t want construction jobs

51 points by mozumder 6 years ago | 99 comments
  • CydeWeys 6 years ago
    Wow, the entire article doesn't mention once what the average wage for entry-level construction workers is. That's probably a huge part of the puzzle -- to omit that seems almost intentionally misleading, or at least bad journalism.

    Also, construction is a job that's notoriously hard on your body. You can't count on being able to do it into your 60s like office work, and one bad accident can end your career in construction (or just flat out end you). And the work itself is hard. Pay needs to be higher than other jobs to compensate for this. I know I'd rather be, say, a Starbucks barista than a construction worker, even if the latter paid a little bit more.

    • wccrawford 6 years ago
      Seems like $14.07.

      https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Construction_Labore...

      Even "Construction Worker" doesn't bring it up much ($14.75), which means there's nothing in that career directly.

      https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Construction_Worker...

      The next step in that career is to be a manager or foreman. The Foreman only gets $22.36. ($38k/yr)

      https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Job=Construction_Forema...

      What does a college grad make? $50k/yr.

      http://time.com/money/collection-post/3829776/heres-what-the...

      Carpenter, handyman and general contractor do better than construction.

      https://www.payscale.com/research/US/Industry=Home_Renovatio...

      So yeah, I'm not surprised that people aren't excited about a career in construction.

      • bobthepanda 6 years ago
        Depends on the market you're in and what you can do.

        > A crane operator in New York City earns $82.15 an hour in base pay and benefits, according to the Engineer News-Record, a trade publication. That's well's above the $66 an hour he would earn in Chicago or the $39 an hour in Washington, D.C.

        > But the real reason New York crane operators and other operating engineers earn such big salaries is overtime and benefits. A relief crane operator working 56 hours of overtime per week for 52 weeks will earn $332,667 in overtime and $159,053 in overtime benefits at the World Trade Center. As a worker's salaries go up, so do the amounts employers must kick in for annuities and pensions.

        https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702303936704576399...

        • CydeWeys 6 years ago
          Crane operators are unionized. That's why they get good pay and have overtime and benefits. https://therealdeal.com/issues_articles/local-14-a-thorn-in-...

          It's really hard to break into though, because unlike entry level construction jobs that pay scraps, the demand is higher than the supply.

          • relate 6 years ago
            and whether you are willing to work 106 (40+56) hours a week...
            • conanbatt 6 years ago
              Thats unions, but such thing also reduces the amount of housing and construction you can make.
            • PantaloonFlames 6 years ago
              As with any field, specialized skills command higher pay.

              Plenty of opportunity to learn a proper skill, like drywall finishing, electrical work, plumbing, or carpentry/cabinetry, and command better than $15/hr in the USA.

              • colek42 6 years ago
                You can make quite a bit more. It is pretty easy to start your business as a tradesman when you have experience, without employees you can easily net over 100k a year in low cost of living markets. Also, many construction workers get the benefit of side jobs and overtime. Definitely not an easy life, but there is something that can be said about the satisfaction you get after building something physical.
                • blanderman 6 years ago
                  That website does not seem very comprehensive. The government makes thorough statistics on income available for free: https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes470000.htm
                  • Ibethewalrus 6 years ago
                    Overheard a construction manager talking about workers making over $120k in SF —-with overtime
                  • TangoTrotFox 6 years ago
                    Here you go:

                    [1] Construction Equipment Operators ($22/hour median)

                    [2] Carpenters ($22/hour median)

                    [3] Construction Laborers and Helpers ($16/hour median)

                    [4] Food and Beverage Serving ($10/hour median)

                    The longevity argument ignores the fact that many careers today are focusing on younger and younger workers as a means of effecting cheap labor. Easy to measure labor costs, not so easy to measure labor skill. How would you put the prospects of a 60 year old software developer looking for work?

                    ---

                    [1] - https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/construc...

                    [2] - https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/carpente...

                    [3] - https://www.bls.gov/ooh/construction-and-extraction/construc...

                    • burlesona 6 years ago
                      Around Austin I remember it being about $12-15/hr back in ~2000-2002. Per the other reply to this message, doesn't seem like it's gone up much.
                      • tw1010 6 years ago
                        They do mention wage, but they don't seem to agree with what you think they are "a job that is generally well-paid".
                      • learc83 6 years ago
                        What's the endgame for construction workers? Everyone can't move into management. Many people's bodies can't handle that kind of manual labor for 40 years, and even if they could construction jobs tend to be insecure.

                        If you want people to make those trade offs you have to pay more.

                        This kind of rhetoric from companies drives me nuts. They push to remove regulations, but when the free market says they have to pay more for labor, suddenly it's not the free market driving up wages, it's a worker shortage. Now we need the government to step in and fix it. You see it most obviously with tech companies pushing for STEM in public schools and the push for more H-1Bs.

                        • OldSchoolJohnny 6 years ago
                          The end game used to be wealthy retirement because it paid extremely well. And on a side note people's bodies can and do handle that kind of manual labour for 40+ years. Not all of course, some get hurt, some are not cut out for it, but go to any manual work site and you will see older people in their 50's and 60's still in excellent physical shape doing it and younger people doing the really hard shitty jobs since time immemorial.
                          • learc83 6 years ago
                            >older people in their 50's and 60's

                            I edited "most people" to "many people" because I really don't have the numbers.

                            From anecdotal experience from friends and family, I'd think most people won't make it through 40 years of hard manual labor without injury. For every 60 year old you see on a job site, we don't know how many of their peers have stopped working construction.

                          • cletus 6 years ago
                            I think this depends a lot on what type of construction you're talking about and also what trade.

                            Residential SFHs is different to low-rise buildings, which I assume is different again to building high-rise buildings.

                            It also depends on what skill you have. General labourers are likely going to be lifting heavy things a lot but I don't think that's universally true. Bricklayers, electricians, plumbers, tilers, etc all have different profiles.

                            I actually think that for a lot of these kinds of jobs that you could be doing them well into your 50s just fine. Being active makes it easier to stay active.

                            Also, if you do pursue a trade you will likely have apprentices eventually. Part of what they're for is doing the heavy lifting.

                            Experience in construction will eventually open up avenues such as being a general contractor, property inspection, construction management and so on.

                            • learc83 6 years ago
                              > also what trade

                              I wasn't talking about skilled trades. Every electrician or plumber I've ever met, even the ones who only do new work, wouldn't call themselves a "construction worker", or say they worked in construction. I was assuming the article was talking about what the BLS calls "construction laborers", but maybe it was talking about all possible trades involved in construction? I only read the article summary.

                              >I actually think that for a lot of these kinds of jobs that you could be doing them well into your 50s just fine.

                              That's likely true for some trades and some people, but from some googling it does look there the risk to your body from working construction is pretty significant. I was able to find a German study of 14k construction workers that said for construction industry as a whole, workers were 1.5x more likely than other blue collar workers to receive a disability pension for musculoskeletal problems, and 1.8 times more likely for accidental injuries. They were over 2x more likely to be disabled from musculoskeletal problems as the general working population.

                              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1741071/

                            • Bluecobra 6 years ago
                              Maybe it would be something like Tesla's model (highly automated assembly line) but for homes. Manufactured homes have been around for a long time but it's not cool. I would buy a eco-friendly modular home if were awesome.
                              • TYPE_FASTER 6 years ago
                                We've been looking at modular, for example:

                                https://huntingtonhomesvt.com/portfolio/

                                https://huntingtonhomesvt.com/featured-home/sylvan-knoll-1/

                                Going from an old house built in 1890 to one built in 1980 with 2x6 walls and modern insulation has been nice. I'd like to go the next step, and homes like the one above combine a nice interior with great efficiency.

                                Going from a 30yr old furnace and standard 10yr water heater to a highly efficient single tankless system was a great step up, both from the energy efficiency and creature comfort perspectives.

                              • krapp 6 years ago
                                The endgame is being replaced by automation.
                                • megaman22 6 years ago
                                  Most of the people I know that did construction worked like dogs for six months of the year on the road, then took most of the rest of the year off. These were mostly workers for largish construction contractors, so they would go into a plant during the biannual shut downs, tear the thing apart and put it back together over the course of three weeks or a month, then move onto the next job. They tended to work a lot of hours, since it's a very tight schedule with deadlines - it costs tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars every day these kinds of plants aren't operating - so they'd rack up a ton of overtime, plus living on the road with housing taken care of or a per diem. It's not really that bad a gig, especially if you can live somewhere cheap the rest of the time. In a lot of ways it's very similar to people I know who are merchant marine.

                                  After a few years they tended to have specialized into something, so they'd get a more regular job or go into business for themselves.

                                • Kluny 6 years ago
                                  I'd love to work construction. But every time I've mentioned it to my family they tell me about how it will destroy my knees and back, I'll lose fingers, get hearing damage, head injuries, and the pay is crap compared to the risk.

                                  If there was decent workplace safety (my hometown is infamous for it's poor safety standards), and a good pension program where you're expected to want to quit and do something else after 10 years or so, before your body is ruined, then I'd be all about it.

                                  • 49531 6 years ago
                                    This is a big reason why unions were created in the first place. Create safer working conditions, and make it possible for people who wear their bodies out can retire.
                                    • bodas 6 years ago
                                      But what if I want to retire with a healthy body not a crippled one?
                                      • lotsofpulp 6 years ago
                                        Then you choose not to perform manual labor. In an ideal situation, the market will pay people a premium for choosing to sacrifice their bodies, assuming everyone is competing on a level playing field and you don't have a huge supply of undereducated workers from another country who have no other options.
                                    • PantaloonFlames 6 years ago
                                      Good point about the pension (or other retirement provision).

                                      You won't lose fingers or lose your hearing if you take proper care. You won't destroy your back if you stay in shape. There are pressures to do the wrong thing. People can resist them. There are risks; this is why people wear hardhats and steel-toed boots on worksites. But the risks can be managed.

                                      The pay remains .. a challenge.

                                      • CydeWeys 6 years ago
                                        Accidents happen. You only have so much control over them. You also aren't the only person on the jobsite. You can be the most careful person in the world, and then die because your fumbling coworker a few stories up dropped a beam on your head.

                                        A good parallel is motorcycles. A good motorcycle rider is much less likely to experience accidents than a bad rider, but even the best rider is still more likely to experience accidents than a car driver, simply because of all the other people on the road. You only have so much control. Likewise, even the best construction worker is still more likely to wear out their body or experience accidents than the average office worker.

                                    • OldSchoolJohnny 6 years ago
                                      Many of these news stories about labour shortages could alternatively be summarized as "Company expects perpetual huge profits and people to continue to work for next to nothing"
                                      • tekstar 6 years ago
                                        These types of jobs eventually burn out your body.

                                        You used to be able to buy a house and grow a family on these wages, and eventually retire. With that no longer being the case, why would anyone with choice choose this option?

                                        • yellowcherry 6 years ago
                                          My dad did these jobs his whole life. He's in still in better shape than I've ever been and has a union pension better than anything any company has ever offered me.

                                          So.

                                          • logfromblammo 6 years ago
                                            That's the point. You couldn't get the same deal as he got, because the industry has changed to be more worker-hostile since your father started.

                                            No company in your industry has ever offered you anything like his union pension, because no companies in any industry (excepting maybe railroads?) offer anything like his union pension. They all stopped doing it some time between him and you.

                                            The young people of today can't go back in time to when your dad was the same age. They have to take the jobs that are offered now. And the companies of now have worked very hard to bust the union influence of the past, so that they can offer crap pay and crap benefits, and shovel most of the risks of working the job onto the worker.

                                            Young people are taking one look at that, and deciding to not even take one step down that career path. All this tells me is that young people are not as stupid as companies assumed them to be. The companies offering jobs that don't balance remuneration with worker risk then have to rely on workers with lower expectations, which is to say immigrants from countries with lower quality-of-life norms. They don't look at the work by judging the job in relation to other jobs in the US, but by comparing it to a similar job in their country of origin, and finding that it is X% better. Then the political scene changes, those workers start to dry up, and the companies are screwed--or, more accurately, hoist on their own petards.

                                            • throwaway5752 6 years ago
                                              So, try to start out as a new person in that area of construction unless it's highly specialized (line work, specialized welding, specialized fabrication, large machine operation with specialized licensure or training...)

                                              Generally speaking, the old pension plans are only for those grandfathered in, new pay scales are lower, and hours to get better service time and benefits are higher.

                                              Also, watch what companies do in terms of carving off subsidiaries with more of their retirees for intentional bankruptcy (see Patriot Coal). Those benefits will be cut in chapter 11 and then offloaded to the PBGC to be paid by the public.

                                              • PantaloonFlames 6 years ago
                                                Yep. My Father-in-law worked logging, fishing boats, and construction all his life and is now mid-70's, strong as an ox, very fit, very capable and knows how to do just about anything. Still working construction. Lighter jobs, but still.

                                                He's lost his hearing, but that's genetic; nothing to do with his labor.

                                                • NegativeK 6 years ago
                                                  Many states don't have unions.
                                              • jeffreyrogers 6 years ago
                                                I've been wondering about the long term sustainability of the rise of service jobs in the developed world. If you can work in finance, law, medicine, or tech that's great. Those are all high skill, high paying jobs. Unfortunately, most people aren't cut out for them, largely due to genetic and environmental factors that they have no control over. So what is the rest of the workforce supposed to do? Work in restaurants and other low-skill, low-paying service jobs?

                                                That doesn't seem sustainable long term. I worry that by losing goods-producing jobs like manufacturing and construction we are creating a long-term problem where people who can't produce high value services end up living an impoverished life. To some extent you could address this problem by making immigration easier which would help create more low-labor cost, goods-producing jobs, which would in-turn lead to more low-skill service jobs.

                                                • null000 6 years ago
                                                  > generally well-paid [1]

                                                  Three seconds on google suggests that they make <40k in my area, typically. That's definitely not well paid, especially for a job that's fickle and physically demanding. Hell, that's barely above minimum wage (I'm in a $15/hr area, minimum wage is $32k) - I can get an office job tomorrow paying close to the same with basically no effort.

                                                  As usual, whenever someone blames labor for labor shortages, just look at the wages. If you pay less than a waiter earns with tips while demanding more out of your workers, don't expect people to be lining up at the door. Same goes for farm labor. Same goes for teachers. Same goes for truckers. And so on.

                                                  [1] - taken from the Non-WSJ alternative in the comments below

                                                  • CydeWeys 6 years ago
                                                    Good point about the employment being fickle. Construction workers get screwed in pretty much every recession, the previous one being particularly bad. The only negative that happened to me in 2008 was we didn't get an annual bonus. The average construction worker saw much reduced hours over a period spanning years, or lost their job entirely. There was a huge outflow from the construction sector during that recession, disproportionately large compared to almost every other employment sector.
                                                  • mamurphy 6 years ago
                                                    Non-WSJ Alternative (seems to be an affiliated summary): https://www.marketwatch.com/story/young-people-are-shunning-...
                                                    • crooked-v 6 years ago
                                                      So pay them more.
                                                      • rhexs 6 years ago
                                                        No reason to do that with current immigration "policy", or lack thereof.
                                                        • tntn 6 years ago
                                                          Quick recap:

                                                          Article: "there's a labor shortage"

                                                          'crooked-v: "So pay them more"

                                                          'rhexs: "No need," because there is plenty of cheap labor.

                                                          Something here doesn't add up.

                                                          • 6 years ago
                                                          • mozumder 6 years ago
                                                            and increase inflation, punishing the poor and elderly on fixed income the most?
                                                            • zaccus 6 years ago
                                                              Inflation happens anyway. Unless wages rise faster than inflation, you can't really argue they drive it.
                                                            • conanbatt 6 years ago
                                                              There isnt a market for that: increased wages would increase house prices and the developer estimates he cant sell the house.

                                                              If land were cheaper you would see rising wages.

                                                              • CydeWeys 6 years ago
                                                                If there isn't a market for it then there isn't a shortage of labor -- the correct equilibrium point has been found. And yet, they're claiming a shortage. They want to eat their cake and have it too.
                                                                • conanbatt 6 years ago
                                                                  If the amount of workers is down, and the wages are similar or up, then you have a "shortage". In comparison to the point you measure of course.

                                                                  Construction pays rather well actually, though it does have high strain on the body.

                                                                  • mozumder 6 years ago
                                                                    And this is how you cause an economy to collapse, by raising inflation.

                                                                    The market doesn’t know what’s good for it. It’s only interest is the immediate short term.

                                                                  • OldSchoolJohnny 6 years ago
                                                                    I think companies have enjoyed historically high profits for a long time now and are simply loath to give that up. What is a reasonable, sustainable level of profit that benefits everyone? It's certainly not what we've seen for the last decade at least. Profits are sky high and wages are deeply stagnant. I've run my own company for decades and I can tell you there isn't a business person alive who will willingly say in public "we're making excellent profits" no matter the situation it's always doom and gloom and the taxes are too high and the wages are too high and there aren't enough qualified candidates etc.
                                                                    • conanbatt 6 years ago
                                                                      Profits are not what make wages go down. Profits make wages go up, because then more gets invested and capital competes for labor. We are also in a decade since the recession of record profits, but that might not be so in the next decade or so (from a macro perspective).

                                                                      Putting a ceiling on profits will not raise wages.

                                                                    • platz 6 years ago
                                                                      "a labor shortage that has meant fewer homes built and rising prices" (emhasis added)

                                                                      So are prices rising or aren't they?

                                                                      • conanbatt 6 years ago
                                                                        You can have rising prices and less sales. Its important to look at volume as well.

                                                                        And land probably is what increased prices the most in the share of costs for developing, due to macro economic reasons.

                                                                        • LargeWu 6 years ago
                                                                          Prices are definitely rising, but it's debatable whether that's due to a labor shortage.
                                                                    • chuckgreenman 6 years ago
                                                                      I love all these "Young people don't want $job_type any more". And then go on to talk about how the jobs don't pay enough, or aren't attracting talent because it's not interesting.

                                                                      Over the past couple of decades the percentage of young people getting degrees has swelled, we've been encouraging everyone to get a degree. Did we expect people to remain in low paying jobs when they can do something else? Those student loans payments aren't making themselves.

                                                                      • TheCoelacanth 6 years ago
                                                                        Why don't young people want to take difficult and dangerous jobs for 1.5x minimum wage? I can't figure it out.
                                                                      • craig1f 6 years ago
                                                                        The funny thing is, growing up, construction is awe-inspiring.

                                                                        In my last position, I worked across the street from where they were putting up two buildings. We'd gawk over how brave they must be to be up that high on the rafters.

                                                                        • CydeWeys 6 years ago
                                                                          Same. I always love looking at buildings in various stages of construction. I designed and built a shed from scratch five years ago and it was highly enjoyable (and of course a lot of hard work). Just the amount of research to figure out how to do everything properly really satisfies that "geeking out on a new hobby" urge.

                                                                          I think people underestimate how bad the whole "being outside during all four seasons" aspect of these jobs is, though. Most other jobs are indoors, whether they're highly skilled (e.g. SWE) or not (e.g. fry cook).

                                                                        • burlesona 6 years ago
                                                                          This seems to me primarily about the wages versus cost of living in the places where construction demand is high. I would also point to this as a death spiral for a housing bubble.

                                                                          The article mentions labor commuting from Sacramento to SF where the wages are higher, thus driving up prices in Sacramento due to lack of supply. That kind of domino effect eventually makes it so SF can't get labor because the labor has shifted to live 90' outside of Sacramento and commute there instead. At some point wages do have to go up, driving up costs further in a vicious cycle.

                                                                          I don't know when but I believe another broad housing market collapse is coming.

                                                                          • platz 6 years ago
                                                                            The market will decide!
                                                                            • linksnapzz 6 years ago
                                                                              Drywall rotting on the trucks, for lack of people to hang it.
                                                                              • 6 years ago
                                                                                • dccoolgai 6 years ago
                                                                                  Why would they? You've spent the last 30 years telling them not to do those jobs, devaluing them with globalization and de-unionizing them to make sure those jobs don't create any kind of sustainable lifestyle for the people that do them. Someone on HN a while back gave some good advice: whenever you see "people won't do X job", append in your mind the qualifier "for Y underpaid salary/benefits package".
                                                                                  • e40 6 years ago
                                                                                    And part of telling them not to do those jobs was the college for everyone idea. It was a good ideal, but the problem is, going to college and getting that English 4-year degree doesn't really help you get a job that pays enough to pay off those student loans and save for retirement.

                                                                                    What they said on Prairie Home Companion was correct, everyone does thing their child is exceptional and should go to college instead of trade school.

                                                                                    The truth is, some of those people working at Starbucks for minimum page, with huge debt, would be far better off had they gone to a trade school and be pulling down serious money as an electrician, etc.

                                                                                    • 49531 6 years ago
                                                                                      I agree that stigmatizing trades has contributed to this issue, but we've also simultaneously made trades worse by allowing their unions to decay and be deregulating the industries that use them.
                                                                                      • godzillabrennus 6 years ago
                                                                                        Over the last 40 years the trades also had influx of illegal immigrants entering the profession. These have been folks who were willing to do the very difficult work for less pay and no recourse if the conditions were unsafe.

                                                                                        Obviously not all trades as most firms won’t gamble using unlicensed electricians and plumbers. On the other hand roofing, drywall, concrete, etc... have been more readily given to folks who work for pennies on the dollar.

                                                                                        • mozumder 6 years ago
                                                                                          OSHA has largely supplanted union safety regulations but the real issue killing this work is just workforce education.

                                                                                          We spend thousands to pay for 12 years of public education for each student to teach them things like Calculus and Geopolitics and Literature only for them to perform manual construction labor that an illegal immigrant from Central America with zero schooling can do?

                                                                                          Yah that’s not happening...

                                                                                          • greenhatman 6 years ago
                                                                                            So why don't they just pay workers more if they need more.

                                                                                            Let demand drive price. This is a clear example of where you don't need a union. Because the companies will simply have to pay more. No need for a union to negotiate higher wages.

                                                                                          • Bluecobra 6 years ago
                                                                                            Maybe the federal government should get out of the loan business and make it legal to declare bankruptcy to escape student loan debt. Colleges have every incentive to enroll as many students as possible and charge whatever they want because the loans are guaranteed by wage garnishment.

                                                                                            This draws parallels to the easy credit that was extended in the last housing collapse to people that shouldn't had mortgages for houses they can't afford in the first place.

                                                                                            • e40 6 years ago
                                                                                              YES! (says someone who didn't borrow a penny for college because it was $900/yr)
                                                                                          • cimmanom 6 years ago
                                                                                            The jobs globalization devalues least are those that require physical presence - such as construction.
                                                                                            • nickthemagicman 6 years ago
                                                                                              On point. You want people just give then good salaryies, benefits, and career growth.
                                                                                              • patrickaljord 6 years ago
                                                                                                I know a few people in construction, they started working for someone by fixing doors, do painting etc. until they learned enough to find their own clients. It's easier than you think to find a friend who needs something to get fixed and get more clients from there by doing local advertising or even door to door knocking to check if people need some fixes. These people I know now hire their own workers (and still work themselves too) and make more than many college graduates I know.

                                                                                                Not saying anyone who gets into construction makes millions but there definitely is a path for growth and good pay is possible. It is however not a glamorous job, you need to get your hand dirty and work with some unhealthy products you need to protect yourself from (as much as you can at least...). It's a tough job but it does pay well. I personally wouldn't do it because of the physical aspect but financially it is definitely interesting.

                                                                                                • lowercased 6 years ago
                                                                                                  > It's easier than you think to find a friend who needs something to get fixed and get more clients from there by doing local advertising or even door to door knocking to check if people need some fixes.

                                                                                                  And... treat it like a business. Show up on time. Answer your phone/text/emails. If you need to cancel, give notice.

                                                                                                  I'm continually flummoxed at how generally bad service industries are in many areas. We had one guy cutting our lawn. BEST EVER. Younger kid - showed up on time, notified ahead when he was coming, would notify if he couldn't make it re: weather delays, then would give us updated time/date. Even more "professional" than professional services we've used. We had one good year, then "I'm going to college, and can't do this any more". He could probably earn more expanding out his operation than he will from whatever college degree he will get. :(

                                                                                                  • nickthemagicman 6 years ago
                                                                                                    It bothers me immensely when people say `if you don't like it just open your own business`.

                                                                                                    There's only so much demand to go around for a service and a huge amount of demand is taken up by already established businesses in that space.

                                                                                                    So now these businesses need people to do the work but are unwilling to pay the people a fair portion of the profit.

                                                                                                    It's fair to make a profit but when you have mostly captured a regional market and you're not willing to pay wages to spread the opportunity to people who could also fill the demand that you captured then that's not right.

                                                                                                    A successful business is largely a part of having good connections, luck, or some sort of exceptional product/service beyond something a provider with a million dollars can offer.

                                                                                                    Like 80% or more (I dont know the exact numbers)in ofmall business fail due to these reasons.

                                                                                                    • CydeWeys 6 years ago
                                                                                                      That requires entrepreneurship though, which is a whole collection of semi-related skills that most people don't have. "Just start your own business" works for some, but not for most. HN is biased more towards those types of folk by its nature, but we aren't a representative sampling of the population at large in this respect.
                                                                                                    • 0x8BADF00D 6 years ago
                                                                                                      Some construction jobs are better than others. In SF, for example, there are many undersea construction jobs that pay very well.

                                                                                                      The CTO of Coinbase envisions that construction[0] as an industry is ripe for disruption, reaping the fruits of technology like VR controllable drones[1]. If you make construction like a video game, “young people” will flock to it.

                                                                                                      [0] https://medium.com/conversations-with-tyler/tyler-cowen-bala...

                                                                                                      [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W18Z3UnnS_0

                                                                                                      • null000 6 years ago
                                                                                                        > If you make construction like a video game, “young people” will flock to it

                                                                                                        That's not why "young people" aren't getting into construction. Fact is, there are easier jobs that pay about the same that are way easier to get into and won't destroy your body by the time you're 40.

                                                                                                        Taking the "destroy your body by the time you're 40" out of the equation might help, but the problem with construction definitely isn't the lack of video games.

                                                                                                      • lotsofpulp 6 years ago
                                                                                                        There is a very high price to pay to make up for ruining your body in some types of work involving repetitive and straining motions. Only reason is until now people didn't have options and had to do it, and didn't know about it. But now people are living longer, and there's lots of data about how different occupations fare in their later years. Any kid can see the lifestyle difference between the kids of manual laborers versus office workers.

                                                                                                        Being able to see your family on a regular basis, being home, not risking your life driving everywhere, all of these have to be made up for in pay.

                                                                                                        • toomuchtodo 6 years ago
                                                                                                          But that costs money. Where’s my pool of desperate labor willing to accept medicorce pay with no benefits and job security. /s

                                                                                                          Welcome to a tight labor market. May it last as long as possible until public policy catches up.

                                                                                                          • Finnucane 6 years ago
                                                                                                            The day the Wall Street Journal advocates for those things is the day hell freezes over.
                                                                                                        • 6 years ago
                                                                                                          • gldev3 6 years ago
                                                                                                            All they have to do is offer 300k a year and unlimited PTO. Ez.
                                                                                                            • minikites 6 years ago
                                                                                                              Young people already can't afford houses so it seems like a self regulating problem.
                                                                                                              • stealthmodeclan 6 years ago
                                                                                                                Why not bring labor on demand from South Asia or Africa.
                                                                                                                • johnvega 6 years ago
                                                                                                                  3D printing construction tech should be a great way to offset this. Also great for space explorations.
                                                                                                                  • berbec 6 years ago
                                                                                                                    Scaling 3D printers to the size and cost require for usefulness is an interesting idea. Otherwise, you're talking about a Lego house.