Solving differential equations on a 6502 with Woz's floating point code

112 points by ben165 5 years ago | 13 comments
  • keithnz 5 years ago
    I find it funny that people enjoy the nostalgia of things like 6502... I loved my Atari 800XL, but wistfully dreamed that computers might one day be able to handle 320x240 with 256 colours.... boy... that would be good! Meanwhile I was hand assembling 6502 into data sections in basic so I could try and draw a circle... who knew drawing circles was so ridculously difficult and slow?

    Having said that, I do like this stuff in hindsight :)

    • pvg 5 years ago
      I liked this piece for the attempt to imagine what using an early personal computer was like and getting it wrong in good and interesting ways - statistically nobody had an Apple I and everything later had BASIC and higher level (i.e. not just monitor) CLIs - that was the big selling point. Later there's a bit about maybe using a decimal FP representation and my first thought was 'no, that's nuts' but your mention of the 800XL sent me to the wikipedia page:

      "The first is that all numeric values in [Atari] BASIC are stored in floating-point binary coded decimal (BCD) format"

      • cmrdporcupine 5 years ago
        Having spent many hours recently futzing writing code for the 65816, including writing an emulator for a machine based around it, and spending many hours investigating writing a C compiler for it...

        I think I might have cured myself of my 6502 nostalgia. I don't want to look at one again for a while.

        • markrages 5 years ago
          Were you using a CORDIC algorithm? Bit shifts and adds, no multiplies required.
      • JJMcJ 5 years ago
        Not the floating point, but saw his code for other parts of the 6502 Apple products, he really was a genius. The code is both very clever AND quite understandable.

        My understanding is his circuit design was similar. One thing, use a part of the circuit for two different things at different points of the clock cycles, so parts count was reduced.

      • diydsp 5 years ago
        Is that first-order approximation appropriate for iteratively solving the Diff EQ? Or does a higher order method such as Runge-Kutta have to be used? I notice the graphs don't align perfectly...
        • ben165 5 years ago
          It's the easiest approach to solve the ODL: Euler Forward (yes, first order). The approximation could be much better and almost exact with a smaller step size. Runge-Kutta is used for higher ODL's, where the Euler method would fail (especially with periodic solutions).
        • ngcc_hk 5 years ago
          Very interesting ... thanks for pointing to py65 as well
          • aswanson 5 years ago
            Awesome. I love projects like this.