Ferroelectric RAM

38 points by curtis 5 years ago | 27 comments
  • leggomylibro 5 years ago
    It's great stuff, but still low capacity and high cost in commercial chips. If you want to play with it, check out TI's MSP430FRxxxx microcontrollers. They have FRAM instead of Flash.

    Also, there are 8-pin FRAM chips with the same pinouts as generic QSPI Flash/RAM/etc chips which you can buy today.

    Again, it's still low-density and expensive, but that seems to be improving and it's fun to make applications which can re-write nonvolatile data by word rather than by page.

    • baybal2 5 years ago
      And destructive reads with limited life cycles, assures a steady recurring revenue for TI...
      • jhayward 5 years ago
        Trillions of cycles isn't that "limited", compared to e.g. Flash.
        • 5 years ago
          • baybal2 5 years ago
            FRAM is far from trillions of cycles, more close to billions, which still kills it after ~5-7 years of intense use.
          • leggomylibro 5 years ago
            Well, if you're really concerned about that, most of them do still have small amounts of SRAM where you can put stuff like commonly-run functions and interrupt handlers.
        • evancox100 5 years ago
          One of the benefits of FRAM is that you can put it through extreme radiation and still have it work afterwards. So you can put it in a medical instrument that undergoes gamma ray sterilization, and it will still not only work but also retain the data.
          • jpmattia 5 years ago
            > One of the benefits of FRAM is that you can put it through extreme radiation and still have it work afterwards.

            There are no oxides in the supporting circuitry? [Do you have a link to rad-hard results?]

        • mark-r 5 years ago
          Not too many days ago someone was complaining about how posts about promising new technology always attracts comments warning that lab results aren't the same as commercial products: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20753342. I responded that countless times in the past promising technologies had passed by without leaving a mark. Ferroelectric RAM could be the poster child for that effect - it's been around for decades but still hasn't made an impact.
          • keithnz 5 years ago
            we make a lot of use of FRAM in our embedded systems. It's great stuff. With huge amount of write cycles it simplifies the data structures you need to store compared to page based / lowish write cycle memories.
            • jhack 5 years ago
              “FeRAM's advantages over Flash include: lower power usage, faster write performance and a much greater maximum read/write endurance (about 10^10 to 10^14 cycles).”

              This sound impressive until you get to the part where reads are destructive, and reads heavily outweigh writes in most workloads. Sounds like a pretty significant disadvantage.

              • kirrent 5 years ago
                That's really not a problem just as it's not a problem in normal RAM. With increased speed and endurance it's a doddle to write back a value after reading with your memory controller even if you're not putting in dedicated refresh hardware. It's really all about density and cost.
                • kragen 5 years ago
                  Unless you lose power in the interim. Flash doesn't have that problem, and normal RAM has it so badly that we rely on Flash to store permanent data and only use DRAM as an ephemeral cache.
                  • roca 5 years ago
                    Surely you could use a capacitor to buffer enough power to complete the rewrite in the event of an external power failure.
                    • kirrent 5 years ago
                      The first datasheet I found for a Cypress FRAM chip gives a required power down rate of at most 30us/V which allows it to continue to provide normal operation protecting data. It's a very easy limitation to live with and engineers often deal with far more difficult problems in unexpected power loss than this.
                      • deelowe 5 years ago
                        Because dram loses its memory when powered off not because there's some issue with how refresh works. Needing to refresh memory after a read is hardly any engineering challenge. We've been dealing with it since memory's inception.
                  • LocalH 5 years ago
                    Fun fact: Sonic 3 for Sega Megadrive/Genesis used FeRAM as save RAM. Generally, a Ramtron FM1208S-200CC. I think a few other carts of theirs used it, I've seen 32X Virtua Racing carts with Ramtron FeRAM parts.