A deeper introduction to Unix DC
72 points by ben165 5 years ago | 19 comments- arexxbifs 5 years agoRelated fun fact: bc is a dc preprocessor[0].
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bc_(programming_language)#Hist...
- staycoolboy 5 years agoI love reading examples of these "great-great-grandparent" applications hidden in /bin. I've used dc in shell scripts for years, but for the simplest of simple computations (e.g., automating FDISK partitioning and doing sector math). Had no idea it could do this.
TIL this and a cool CSS trick.
- c0l0 5 years agodc is worth having installed because of this CLI gem alone:
I've never tried to understand what's really going on to produce the result, but also wouldn't really know where to start - maybe someone in HN's audience can enlighten me? :)echo "[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb729901041524823122snlbxq" | dc
- em500 5 years agodc and bc are standard POSIX utils (and also part of busybox for embedded systems) so for most unix-like systems they're installed by default unless you take active measures to exclude them.
- c0l0 5 years agoPOSIX.1-2017 describes the `dc` program as "excluded" from the standard; check https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu... for details.
Many GNU/Linux distros (at least Debian and RHEL) install neither `dc` nor `bc` by default, afaik.
- yjftsjthsd-h 5 years ago> Many GNU/Linux distros (at least Debian and RHEL) install neither `dc` nor `bc` by default, afaik.
Yeah, I recently wrote a script that used bc and immediately discovered that it didn't work on at least Arch Linux (and I think others, although I only seem to have added it to the Arch ansible config...); conveniently, I only needed the most trivial of calculations, so I just shifted to awk, which has better default availability.
- akira2501 5 years agoGentoo doesn't include it in the common 'stage3' tarball, either. Which is annoying because it's actually required to compile the linux kernel.
- em500 5 years agoI stand corrected, only bc is included in POSIX.
- yjftsjthsd-h 5 years ago
- 5 years ago
- c0l0 5 years ago
- na85 5 years ago
- kps 5 years ago
produces the same output using Unix dc but not in the GNU near-clone. (To understand why, you have to R the P as well as the M.)echo '1033333377708482P' | dc
- m463 5 years ago
echo 'EGSZ%%%'|tr 'E-Z%' 'R-ZA-M!'
- em500 5 years ago
- Hitton 5 years agoFunny. Despite being long time Linux user this is the first time I remember hearing about dc. I only knew bc.
- m463 5 years agoI have a way of looking at this. More people are familiar with apples than okra. (there's a reason for that)
- m463 5 years ago
- seryoiupfurds 5 years ago
[Monte Carlo approximation of Pi. Registers: u - routine : execute i if sum of squares less than 1 i - routine : increment register x z - routine : iterator - execute u while n > m++ r - routine : RANDU PRNG m - variable: number of samples x - variable: number of samples inside circle s - variable: seed for r k - variable: scale for division n - variable: number of iterations (user input) ]c [lrx 2^ lrx 2^ + 1>i]su [lx 1+ sx]si [lu x lm 1+ d sm ln>z]sz [0k ls 65539 * 2 31^ % d ss lkk 2 31 ^ /]sr ? sn 5dksk 1 ss lzx lx lm / 4* p $ dc pi.dc 100000 3.13372
- azizsaya 5 years agoAah! command I encounter and ignore when I mistype cd
- yjftsjthsd-h 5 years agoAt least it's not sl ;)
- yjftsjthsd-h 5 years ago
- 082349872349872 5 years ago6581840dnP
- kps 5 years ago
Is that a gnuism?156 is unimplemented
- 082349872349872 5 years agoYes, sorry. Try:
(at least we now know the error is old enough to be in octal)6582352 dpP
- 082349872349872 5 years ago
- kps 5 years ago