Opera: Phantom of the Turnaround – 70% Downside
12 points by artificialidiot 4 years ago | 5 comments- hakfoo 4 years agoIt feels like they should have put more background in the original sin that put Opera on this road.
When they used the Presto engine, that gave them a product they could sell- a unique engine they could license for embedded markets, for example. Remember the Wii ran an Opera derivative. They decided to roll out a Blink-based version (v12->15 transition) and that shot them in the foot in every possible way:
* They no longer had a product they could commercialize for licensing revenue. Why buy Blink from them instead of doing your own Chromium fork for free?
* The Blink version was so feature-poor for years that the power users that loved Opera 12 eventually moved to products like Vivaldi, which felt like it was trying to capture the same spirit. I suspect many of them abandoned Opera's portal services which could have been a revenue stream.
Ironically, I suspect the value of a (maintained) Presto engine would only have risen, especially after Chromium!Edge arrived and furthered the fear of a browser monoculture.
- reiichiroh 4 years agoDoes Opera still own Fastmail?
- nmjenkins 4 years agoNot since 2013: https://fastmail.blog/2013/09/25/exciting-news-fastmail-staf...
- nmjenkins 4 years ago
- codpiece 4 years agoThat such a cool FOSS project would turn to predatory lending is fascinating.
- MeinBlutIstBlau 4 years agoHoly crap...all from a browser based company.