Build a Fusion Reactor

32 points by shutterstock 2 years ago | 18 comments
  • FiatLuxDave 2 years ago
    Having built much of a fusion reactor in my apartment... (but not the classic Farnsworth design)

    1) A much easier (and usually cheaper and more accurate) way to measure neutrons is to just rent a proper device, from somewhere like: https://instruments.energysolutions.com/instrument-rental/ne.... Not a big fan of bubble dosimeters, except when you need to measure a place you cannot be at the time of measurement (like on the unshielded roof of a linac bunker).

    2) Best to check with your significant other before doing stuff in shared areas. Twice I have been banned from "doing science stuff in the kitchen", once when I got a 5" NeFeB magnet stuck to the oven and we almost got badly injured removing it, and once when I thermally decomposed AlOH3 in the oven. This is why the rest of the fusion reactor was not built at home.

    3) Power supplies are an important and expensive component. We got most of ours by buying an obsolete ion implanter, and just pulled the power supplies from it. This is a lot cheaper than buying new or even used stand-alone supplies. However, the problem with old power supplies is sometimes they have a problem, and troubleshooting high voltage supplies can be more than tricky. A 180 kV supply got me bad once when the drain resistor was broken and I tried to change a capacitor - when I felt the zap go in one hand and out where I was sitting, I thought "ok, I'm dead". Luckily it wasn't enough charge to kill me. Invest in a long dry wooden dowel, so you can check if surfaces are charged before you touch them.

    • ohiovr 2 years ago
      Could you comment on something I was thinking about casually one day. I reckon the grid causes ions to slam into it and lose energy. Why not intentionally cause cathode "grid" be part of the fuel? For instance think of a specially designed water cutting jet that shot a very thin beam of heavy water in the center of a cavity that was disc shaped. The Anode is around the perimeter. The body is made of fused silica welded with fluxed glass. The heavy water could have a little lithium in it to make it very electrically conductive. The water is at earth ground.

      The ions get accelerated to the beam and hit it dead on along with the heavy water deuterium inside of it. They may also meet particles coming in from the opposite direction.

      What do you think of the idea?

      • FiatLuxDave 2 years ago
        Sure, no prob.

        What you describe is very similar to the design of a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_generator , except replacing the deuteron-metal hydride with a stream of heavy water. There might be some small advantages to using oxygen as the matrix holding the deuterium instead of metal (lower Z-number means more energy goes into ion collision as opposed to heating electrons).

        But even if you were to have a pure deuterium target, this type of design has the problem that when your target is colder than your ions, the target gets heated up. This either turns it to a plasma (which then starts to radiate away energy and needs containment) or if you cool it to keep it cold, the colder the electrons in the material are the faster they absorb energy from the ions, and so most of your ion energy goes towards heating electrons rather than initiating fusion collisions.

        So, yeah, it would work to make fusion reactions, but I don't know if it would be worth the added complexity over just using a hydride electrode. Titanium is basically a deuterium sponge.

        • ohiovr 2 years ago
          Would you like to entertain another thought I had?
          • ohiovr 2 years ago
            Thank you so much for your feedback!
      • sph 2 years ago
        What's the price range for this build? I really got into fusion lately, and I've saved about $1,500 over the past couple months. I don't need the best tech, for my first build I can get some cheap parts off Aliexpress.
        • mrlonglong 2 years ago
          The last time someone built a fission reactor the feds had to step in and remove things as things were dangerously radioactive. Be doubly careful.
          • labawi 2 years ago
            This is fusion. Different working principle, different composition - I would expect orders of magnitude less radioactive working materials.
          • LoganDark 2 years ago
            I love the energy this tutorial gives off.
            • sph 2 years ago
              Wait until you see the energy this thing gives off if not properly built.
              • LoganDark 2 years ago
                You don't see that kind of energy >:3
            • shutterstock 2 years ago
              Yes, you can build your very own nuclear fusion reactor in your house! But first, a few warnings...
              • ohiovr 2 years ago
                The fusor is still the best idea from a cost to accomplishment perspective.
                • johntopia 2 years ago
                  Wow people made the Sun. lol