> In my paper, we didn’t bother to study the influence of these other obviously relevant factors.

So you are not honest, self sensoring and betray science.

> I left academia over a year ago, Now... as a member of a private nonprofit research center

Sounds like escape from peer review and criticism.

> scientists calculated that the two largest climate change impacts on society are deaths related to extreme heat and damage to agriculture. However, heat-related deaths have been declining, and crop yields have been increasing for decades

Dude air conditioning and medical care are getting better. Also farmers are having their master degree.

> we can overcome some major negative effects of climate change. using technology to adapt to climate change... (not) addressing emissions

Did author think that climate change is bad solely because of some human may die more in the future? The whole ecosystem and planet is ignored? Also ignoring the root cause is just idiot.

> deaths from weather and climate disasters over the last century

Proved above point.

> while ignoring potential changes in technology and resilience

Can technology and society change to a point that plant never stop photosynthesis when it is too hot? We are under a society that people reject genome modification and geo engineering.

> my papers were rejected out of hand by the editors of distinguished journal... confirmation bias of the editors and reviewers

Only thing you care in your paper is money. Climate change damage the economy so you care about it. What about the whole planet? What about stuff other than human?