My first GitHub action: treats Chat GPT reviews on PRs like Static Code Analysis

1 point by bigEnotation 1 year ago | 2 comments
  • chiefalchemist 1 year ago
    I understand the parallel to peer-based code reviews, but not static code analysis. Can someone elaborate?
    • bigEnotation 1 year ago
      This is largely based on my experience (which may be incomplete), but static code analysis tools in our CI pipeline don’t add comments to a PR, rather generate a report and will sometimes annotate the affected coded.

      Annotations are not tracked historically so any new ci run will regenerate the annotations. I thought this was better for chat gpt reviews since they’re non-deterministic and each CI run could result in different types of feedback.