CCS Redux: Carbon Capture Is Expensive Because Physics
2 points by elmolino89 1 year ago | 4 comments- elmolino89 1 year agoCarbon capture and sequestration is expensive because it has three components, each with its own expensive challenges: capture, distribution, and sequestration. The mass of CO2 produced is 2-3 times the mass of coal or methane* burned and is more challenging per unit to ship than coal, so the cost of capture, distribution and sequestration is typically a multiple of the cost of doing the same with the coal or methane.
- dredmorbius 1 year agoNB: HN frowns on general article summaries:
- elmolino89 1 year agoThank you. Point taken. I was mistaken assuming that this summary goes not as a comment but as summary of the submission.
- dredmorbius 1 year agoThat can be confusing. More here: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39213144>
- dredmorbius 1 year ago
- elmolino89 1 year ago
- dredmorbius 1 year ago