Assange Final Appeal

20 points by k1m 1 year ago | 6 comments
  • SuperNinKenDo 1 year ago
    Amazing breakdown. Murray manages to walk the line perfectly of confronting the total, farcical injustice of it all without working me up into an emotional state. And the summaries of the legal arguments would be hard not to follow. Great balance of narrative and important facts. Excellent writing.
    • SCAQTony 1 year ago
      WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was charged with 18 Counts of disseminating classified information on July 12, 2007. If Assange had surrendered to US authorities circa 2007 (He wasn't indicted till 2019), he would have been sentenced to no more than 15 years if he was found guilty on all counts and had no parole.

      https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/wikileaks-founder-julian-assa...

      • k1m 1 year ago
        From the article:

        > There was no guarantee further charges would not be brought more serious than those which had already been laid, in particular with regard to the Vault 7 publication of CIA secret technological spying techniques. In this regard, the United States had not provided assurances the death penalty could not be invoked.

        > The CIA had made plans to kidnap, drug and even to kill Mr Assange. This had been made plain by the testimony of Protected Witness 2 and confirmed by the extensive Yahoo News publication. Therefore Assange would be delivered to authorities who could not be trusted not to take extrajudicial action against him.

        • justinclift 1 year ago
          That's if they don't Epstein him. :(
          • webmaven 1 year ago
            Is that a verb now?
            • justinclift 1 year ago
              It's been used like that for some time by many others, so probably yes. :)