Google CEO forbids political talk after firing 28 over Israeli contract protest

27 points by basilgohar 8 months ago | 12 comments
  • nabla9 8 months ago
    Tech workers and Google leadership have both been very naive. Tech workers for believing that they can have influence within a company when it really matters, Company leadership for going along with it, and maybe even believing it by themselves at times.

    Unless the CEO gets a mandate from the board and shareholders saying that It's OK to take financial hit because employer activism inside the firm is so important, it's all patronizing and empty talk.

    There are only few ways employers can do political action inside a big company when labor laws are weak.

      1. Quitting. 
  2. Unsanctioned agitation (getting fired if caught)
  3. Sabotage (risking getting charged if caught)
    The normal way is to act as a private citizen outside the company.
    • more_corn 8 months ago
      Employees at Google think they have a say because they’ve been told that they do. Open communication and regular employee feedback have been a part of their culture for decades.

      If you want your employees to sit down shut up and work don’t pretend otherwise.

      Perhaps you’ve heard of their TGIF tradition where every week management speaks openly about what’s going on and they solicit questions. That’s a culture of open communication.

      Perhaps sundar wishes to change that. If so he should say so. And if he does perhaps the employees will call for a no confidence vote which would be nonbinding but what board retains a ceo who fails a no confidence vote from within?

      • nabla9 8 months ago
        You repeated what I said, just better. It was pretend all along, but maybe both sides believed it a little.

        >what board retains a ceo who fails a no confidence vote from within?

        Every board who thinks the CEO is right. Unless shareholders agree that loss of revenue is less important than open communication they think CEO is right.

        >If so he should say so

        He just said so and fired people. No political discussions.

      • _aavaa_ 8 months ago
        Or, obvious #4: form a union and stand in solidarity.
        • dasil003 8 months ago
          A union formed on the basis of supporting one side of controversial global political issues with no direct connection to the wellbeing of the union workers seems like it would be on pretty questionable footing
          • _aavaa_ 8 months ago
            I didn't mean that workers form a union specifically just for this. But rather than they form a union for their own protection in general, and then stand in solidarity with others.

            This would be far from the first time it happened. Some notable examples:

            - The 1984 refusal of US and Canadian dockworkers to unload South African cargo in protest of the apartheid government

            - The 2019 The NYT Taxi Workers Alliance's work stoppage to protest a Muslin Ban

            - The 2020 work stoppage from the ILWU in support of BLM

            • bigger_cheese 8 months ago
              It happened in the past in Australia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1938_Dalfram_dispute)

              Union workers on the docks refused to load Pig Iron which was being sent to Japan, this was whilst Japan was committing atrocities in China.

          • awalsh128 7 months ago
            There have been previous protests for things like defense contracts and succeeded. Google was openly and self proclaimed political in allowing it in the workplace. The change has only happened in the last couple of years.

            It is a bit hypocritical too that there is this mandate yet Sundar called Trump to congratulate him.

          • basilgohar 8 months ago
            I tried my best to not editorialize the title and still make it fit. Full original title is, "Sundar Pichai tells Google staff he doesn’t want any more political debates in the office after firing 28 employees over Israeli contract protest".
            • salesynerd 8 months ago
              I agree with the stance that companies like Google, Meta, et al are taking. Politics, like religion, should be strictly a personal matter and not be used to push a personal belief onto a larger group. As the GP noted, one is free to leave their employer if they don't agree with the latter's policies; they can't (and shouldn't be allowed to) force their viewpoints on others.
              • WheelsAtLarge 8 months ago
                Byline date: April 22, 2024
                • dekhn 8 months ago
                  I sure hope they shut down industryinfo, that hive of scum and villany.