Post-Attack Assessment of First 12 Days of Israeli Strikes on Iran Nuclear

21 points by pinewurst 1 week ago | 14 comments
  • asdefghyk 1 week ago
    I just wish we could wish we just get along. There must be so so much pain for the ( basic average ) people on both sides of these conflicts.
    • firefax 1 week ago
      >isis-online.org

      Heck of a name for a think tank.

    • assbuttbuttass 1 week ago
      Destroying Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities was never the real goal, it's just a convenient casus belli (the same as WMDs in Iraq). Ted Cruz openly stated in an interview last week that the goal is regime change in Iran.

      The goal with these preliminary strikes is to get Iran to retaliate, and use that as justification for further escalation.

      • garyfirestorm 1 week ago
        I’d argue the initial strikes was a cover to exfiltrate the scientists and understand how far along they were and get intelligence about locations of the fissile material and target it.
        • birn559 1 week ago
          For Israel, the strategic goal has always been to stop the endangering of Israel and their citizen by Iran.
          • readthenotes1 1 week ago
            Cruz is an attention whore. I wouldn't trust him if he said one plus one is two if it got him air time
          • ruthie_cohen 1 week ago
            Americans own Defense Intelligence Agency’s leaked classified report contradicts this report and suggests Iran has only been set back by a few months.
            • firefax 1 week ago
              They were saying on NPR this morning that DIA doesn't incorporate all sources (eg: no HUMINT/SIGINT from CIA/NSA).

              It might be where based on things like satellite photos they cannot draw certain conclusions that are unable to be discussed publicly due to blowing a source.

              • AnimalMuppet 1 week ago
                The GP said two things: "leaked" and "classified". For that reason, I strongly suspect that "unable to be discussed publicly due to blowing a source" is the reason for anything... unless you think it was "leaked" as a deliberate misdirection.
                • firefax 1 week ago
                  As I said in my previous statement, the journalist said that they made their assessment using only things like satellite data and that folks like NSA/CIA might have a different take but it would not be discussed in public due to the nature of HUMINT.

                  So imagine someone leaks a report that doesn't use all available sources to bolster their side of a story or because they lack the theory of mind to understand it's not the bombshell they think it is.

                  I don't know how to write this out more simply for you.